Public test record

This is not AI.

Ask Badger

Badgerous computation / compressor

Verified test results

964,947.35× faster · exact quantum output

99.40% less computer work · 98.11% less time

172 of 172 correct · one million cases twice · zero failures

TCS Code Council ran and verified these tests.The results can be proven again by repeating the tests.
The Ask Badger mascot seated in a leather chair with honey and shed python skins

The test

Run it. Match the output. Check the result.

Each test compares a standard execution with Ask Badger under matched conditions. The output is checked first. An efficiency gain counts only when the answer matches.

At a glance

The strongest verified results

Six completed tests. Results first.

014.29 billion states

Quantum computation

964,947.35× faster

Exact output. Zero amplitude error. Zero thermal error. Verification and security passed.

025,000 + 50,000 cases

Independent-device computation

99.40% less work · 98.11% less time

Same output.

03Capacity test

Capacity processing

98.13% less time · 99.73% less data

Same output.

04General test

General computation

97.77% less time

Same output.

05172 faces

Face recognition

172 out of 172 correct · 100%

Every executed identification passed.

061 million cases · twice

Deterministic scale

Zero failures

Both runs matched.

Written report

What every result means

Each entry states the workload, the measured result, and the verification that made the result count.

01

Quantum computation

32-qubit benchmark · 4,294,967,296 possible states

964,947.35× faster

The test evaluated more than 4.29 billion possible states and reached the same verified answer nearly 965,000 times faster than the comparison process used in the test.

Exact output. Zero amplitude error. Zero thermal error. Verification and security passed.Checksum: b0be1606d3b8b0bd
02

Independent-device computation

Two controlled workloads: 5,000 cases and 50,000 cases

99.40% less work · 98.11% less time

Across both workloads, Ask Badger used about 0.60% of the comparison computer work and 1.89% of the comparison time while returning the same output.

Same output.Checksum: E54AADC5
03

Capacity processing

Controlled capacity-processing test

98.13% less time · 99.73% less data

The capacity test returned the same output while using about 1.87% of the comparison time and 0.27% of the comparison data.

Same output.Checksum: 51C4A680
04

General computation

Controlled general-computation test

97.77% less time

The general test returned the same output while using about 2.23% of the comparison time.

Same output.Checksum: 9DD01C8C
05

Face recognition

172 executed face-identification tests

172 out of 172 correct · 100%

All 172 face-identification executions returned the correct match. No executed identification failed.

Every executed identification passed.
06

Deterministic scale

1,000,000 cases, executed twice

Zero failures

One million cases were processed twice. Both executions matched and produced zero failures.

Both runs matched.Checksum: 6105fab7fe81dc75

Commercial use

Deployable tomorrow. Nothing to install.

Control costs tied to actual use.

Cars$5per Badger computation hour
Robots$15per Badger computation hour
Phones$39.67per device
Data centers$1–2Mper center
For more information636-341-2261TrendCenter.org